Agency risk
Vendor ACRs are useful, but they are not automatic proof of accessibility.
A vendor report can be incomplete, outdated, vague, or based on limited testing. We help agencies verify whether the documented claims match the actual product, version, workflows, and WCAG/Section 508 expectations before approval.
ADA Title II web and mobile app compliance timelines include April 26, 2027 for larger public entities and April 26, 2028 for smaller entities and special district governments.
Vague “Supports” claims
We check whether claims include meaningful remarks, testing evidence, and known limitations.
Outdated product scope
We compare the ACR against the current product, version, workflows, and user paths being purchased.
Missing manual testing
We identify gaps automated scans miss, including keyboard, screen reader, forms, modals, and focus behavior.
No remediation path
We turn findings into vendor questions, acceptance criteria, retesting steps, and procurement recommendations.
What you receive
Clear outputs your procurement, IT, legal, and accessibility teams can use.
Not just a scan. Not just a checklist. You receive decision-ready documentation that explains risk, evidence, next steps, and vendor follow-up.
ACR credibility review
Completeness, scope, version, WCAG edition, testing methods, ratings, remarks, and missing evidence.
Executive risk summary
Plain-language risk level, procurement impact, key blockers, and recommended approval path.
Manual WCAG/508 findings
Severity-ranked issues with user impact, reproduction steps, expected behavior, and recommended fixes.
Vendor questions
Specific clarification requests your agency can send before purchase, renewal, or acceptance.
Remediation roadmap
Practical next steps, acceptance criteria, retesting priorities, and vendor accountability notes.
Procurement recommendation
Approve, conditionally approve, require remediation, request a revised ACR, or escalate for risk acceptance.
Manual testing
Human accessibility testing that verifies what the ACR claims.
We combine ACR review, manual WCAG/Section 508 testing, assistive technology checks, and vendor remediation support so your agency is not relying on vendor claims alone.
Vendor VPAT and ACR validation
We review report completeness, conformance claims, remarks, testing methods, product scope, and risk indicators.
Manual WCAG and Section 508 testing
We test websites, applications, SaaS platforms, portals, mobile app workflows, PDFs, and documents.
Keyboard and assistive technology testing
We evaluate real user workflows, focus order, keyboard traps, forms, dialogs, navigation, and screen reader behavior.
Vendor remediation support
We help agencies communicate findings, request fixes, define acceptance criteria, and track remediation through retesting.
Service packages
Choose the review path that matches the procurement risk.
Fast triage
Rapid ACR Risk Review
Best for agencies reviewing a vendor report before purchase, renewal, or contract approval.
- ACR completeness check
- Red flags and missing evidence
- Vendor clarification questions
- Preliminary risk rating
Most common
Manual WCAG/508 Workflow Audit
Best for websites, portals, SaaS systems, forms, mobile workflows, and documents.
- Keyboard and focus testing
- Screen reader review
- Forms, errors, dialogs, and navigation
- Severity-ranked findings
Vendor follow-through
Remediation and Retesting
Best when a vendor needs to fix issues before approval or production acceptance.
- Acceptance criteria
- Fix guidance
- Retesting matrix
- Updated risk status
Ongoing support
Procurement Accessibility Gatekeeper
Best for agencies reviewing multiple vendors, systems, or recurring procurement requests.
- Ongoing ACR validation
- Vendor Q&A support
- Review templates
- Recurring retests
Sample output
Show agencies exactly what they are buying.
A sample finding helps procurement teams understand the level of evidence, clarity, and next-step guidance they will receive before they contact you.
Get procurement-ready findingsKeyboard users cannot complete the payment workflow.
- Impact
- Users who cannot use a mouse may be blocked from submitting required information.
- Evidence
- Focus moves behind the modal after “Continue,” and the submit button is not reachable with Tab.
- Standard
- WCAG 2.1 AA: Keyboard, No Keyboard Trap, Focus Order, Focus Visible. Section 508 relevance applies.
- Vendor question
- Can the vendor confirm remediation timeline, affected versions, and retesting evidence?
- Recommendation
- Conditionally approve only after remediation, retest, and revised ACR remarks.
Simple process
From vendor documentation to fully conformant accessibility.
Step 1: Submit the VPAT or ACR
Send us the vendor report, product information, and key workflows your team needs reviewed.
Step 2: We validate and test
We review the VPAT & ACR, test priority workflows, document issues, and identify risk before approval.
Step 3: You receive next steps
You get a clear findings summary, remediation guidance, vendor follow-up questions, and procurement-ready recommendations. We can also support vendor remediation and retesting.
Request a review
Need to validate a vendor ACR?
Send the details and we will follow up about scope, timing, confidentiality needs, and the best review path for your agency. We can review the ACR first, then recommend whether manual testing is needed.
VPATPRO
Atlanta, Georgia
Pineville, Kentucky
601.400.7662
info@vpatpro.com
Accessibility compliance support only. VPATPRO does not provide legal advice.